2011-03-28 ADMIN 

I have had the opportunity to discuss IT solutions in large governmental institutes and large companies with business people the last couple of days, and I have got to learn a new word: “app oriented architecture”. It is not one or two times, it is more a rule than exception that these people have been deeply influenced by applications on IPhone and Android.

– “We are looking at designing a central data storage where we have all the business logic and data, and then create small applications around that for all the functionality we need. Like this (a mandatory finger pointing at a phone – every time) small simple applications that can be replaced and easily developed by contractors.”

To me it sounds a bit like SOA, but these persons don’t share that view:

– “We had a SOA project a couple of years ago, it was a complete failure, we will do it right this time.”

Ok, being a software developer and architect I had never thought about IPhone applications as being something you should base an IT architecture around. But clarely there is something about the IPhone that makes people think in new ways.

So what is app oriented architecture then? Well when you think about it, the idea is not all bad, in fact it is really, really good. Not in a development/technical way, but in a pedagogical way. Suddenly we have means to talk about functionality and architecture in a way that the non geeks can understand, because suddenly they understand that functionality should be lightweight, contained, based on a common platform, available as a packaged solution on demand. And when I started to think more about that, it is clear that the geeks (developers and architects) can learn from that as well. Less integration, clearer interfaces, user driven deployments, unused apps gets outdated, improved rollout of upgrades, etc… The IT department could be organized as an “appstore” providing inhouse and near house developed functionality packaged as components and deployed on user demand.

But why is it that the business people thinks that this is all better than SOA (and why do I agree)? Well the main problem with SOA is that it is too technical, even the name Service Oriented Architecture talks about a technical solution on the IT side of the problem, not the business side. So SOA takes a technical approach to solve a business problem and at the same time limits the IT department to a heavy rigid platform with ESBs and WebServices.

The paradigm shift where is that it has suddenly been clear to business people what a “service” really is. It is not a WebService interface on the financial system, or a security service in an expensive product or some other technical beast. It is a piece of functionality that is clear to everyone what it does and why – just like “I use this app to look at the weather forecast”. Suddenly business people can talk about business (not weather) and geeks can focus on putting that business into systems. If we have to call it app oriented architecture, then that is fine by me. As long as I’m not forced to use web services or ESBs just because a “SOA provider” need to make money.